§
3546. Investigation of vicious domestic pets or wolf-hybrids;
order
(a) When
a domestic pet or wolf-hybrid has bitten a person while the domestic
pet or wolf-hybrid is off the premises of the owner or keeper,
and the person bitten requires medical attention for the attack,
such person may file a written complaint with the legislative
body of the municipality. The complaint shall contain the time,
date and place where the attack occurred, the name and address
of the victim or victims, and any other facts that may assist
the legislative body in conducting its investigation required
by subsection (b) of this section.
(b) The
legislative body, within seven days from receipt of the complaint,
shall investigate the charges and hold a hearing on the matter.
If the owner of the domestic pet or wolf-hybrid which is the subject
of the complaint can be ascertained with due diligence, said owner
shall be provided with a written notice of the time, date and
place of hearing and the facts of the complaint.
(c) If
the domestic pet or wolf-hybrid is found to have bitten the victim
without provocation, the municipal officials shall make such order
for the protection of persons as the facts and circumstances of
the case may require, including, without limitation, that the
domestic pet or wolf-hybrid is disposed of in a humane way, muzzled,
chained, or confined. The order shall be sent by certified mail,
return receipt requested. A person who, after receiving notice,
fails to comply with the terms of the order shall be subject to
the penalties provided in section 3550 of this chapter.
(d) The
procedures provided in this section shall only apply if the domestic
pet or wolf-hybrid is not a rabies suspect. If a member of the
legislative body or a municipal official designated by the legislative
body determines that the animal is a rabies suspect, the provisions
of subchapter 5 of this chapter and the rules of the department
of health shall apply.
HISTORY:
Amended 1977, No. 215 (Adj. Sess.), §
2, eff. April 12, 1978; 1993, No. 213 (Adj. Sess.), §
4, eff. June 15, 1994.
NOTES:
HISTORY
SOURCE.
V.S. 1947, § 7629.
P.L. § 8292.
G.L. § 6742.
1910, No. 223. P.S.
§ 5651.
1902, No. 121, § §
1, 3.
AMENDMENTS--1993
(ADJ. SESS.). Substituted "domestic pets or wolf-hybrids" for
"dogs" in the section catchline.
Subsection
(a): Amended generally.
Subsection
(b): Substituted "domestic pet or wolf-hybrid" for "dog" preceding
"which" in the second sentence.
Subsection
(c): Substituted "domestic pet or wolf-hybrid" for "dog" preceding
"is found" and preceding "is disposed" and "shall" for "may" preceding
"make such" in the first sentence and "subject to the penalties
provided in section 3551 of this chapter" for "fined not more
than $250.00" following "order shall be" in the third sentence.
Subsection
(d): Added.
--1977
(ADJ. SESS.). Amended section generally.
CROSS
REFERENCES
Search
warrants, see § 3551
of this title.
ANNOTATIONS
1.
CONSTRUCTION.
Town's
right to control dogs that bite, pursuant to this section, did
not give rise to a generalized duty to control vicious dogs for
purposes of common law negligence liability. Rubin v. Town
of Poultney (1998) 168 Vt. 624, 721 A.2d 504 (mem.).
2.
DESTRUCTION OF DOGS.
Police
officers are authorized to destroy vicious dogs under authority
of this section when they have been given appropriate orders to
do so. 1952-54 Op. Atty. Gen. 299.
The
authority granted state police officers by §
1914 of this title is broad enough to clothe them with
power to act when required to destroy dogs under this section.
1952-54 Op. Atty. Gen. 299.
CITED.
Cited in Morgan v. Kroupa (1997) 167 Vt. 99, 702 A.2d
630.
USER
NOTE: For more generally applicable notes, see notes under the
first section of this heading: division, article, chapter, part
or title.